

|
By: Evren On: 05:59 Jan 21st, 2008 Offline |
Free? EA?! *snort* That wont last long, they'll come back to thier senses soon enough. Never really a fan of battlefield myself, and most people who are, have already bought it. |
|||
|
By: dragongee On: 06:05 Jan 21st, 2008 Online |
I've never heard of battlefield before - although if you show me the front cover of a game i would prob recognise it... The thing that dargged me in to this article wasnt the "free" - it was Mr Gerhard Florin. He always seems to have an opinon on things especially in the best interests of a gamer... |
|||
|
By: Shad On: 02:37 Jan 21st, 2008 Offline |
EA did the whole In Game Advertising thing before in Battlefield 2142 and it flopped there like a mother. Only a few companies got behind it like intel and, umm, I think that was about it. Oh, it totally killed immersion, too. Now, if the battlefield game was set in modern day times, I'd have no problem with a signpost or billboad sprouting the golden arches, because it belongs there in modern cities. EA have been heading towards micro transactions for a while now; in Tiger Wood's Golf cheats could be purchased for a few dollars here or there, I imagine unlockable content will be the same deal here. Upgrade your gun? $5 please. Want extra ammo storage or the ability to sprint further? Cough up. It's an interesting little experiment. I wonder if EA think they can honestly turn a profit from this sort of thing? Guess we'll find out after this game is out for a few months. |
|||
|
By: EvilxBunny On: 04:11 Jan 22nd, 2008 Offline |
It worked for Turok and Prince of Persia ;p. I dont think its a bad idea. | |||
|
By: dilmanator On: 07:43 Jan 22nd, 2008 Offline |
It didn't work for far cry. I played the free version of the game and was so sickened by the ad's I went out and paid 20 AU dollars and picked it up from the budget shelf. Well I suppose if it made me go out and do that it did work for the developer :P |
|||
|
By: boa On: 10:06 Jan 23rd, 2008 Offline |
Depends on what the micro transactions are for. If it's weapon/character upgrades, then people with the money would have an advantage. Those and enthusiasts. Oh, and little old me and many other people, lack the ability to even get this game... |
|||
|
By: Dragonfly On: 01:07 Jan 24th, 2008 Online |
Honestly, this just seems like a strange direction for Electronic Arts to take. Micro-management games are a hit and miss thing. I fail to understand why they'd even be interested in pursuing it. |
|||
|
By: boa On: 09:02 Jan 24th, 2008 Offline |
Cause if it hits, great. If it misses, they can afford and possibly release it the stanard way "due to popular demand" | |||
